Discussion about this post

User's avatar
tresho's avatar

I went through medical school over 50 years ago. Way back then we were initially taught the correct methods as you have outlined. Then ever afterward we seldom if ever checked our patients with the recommended methods. One thing I think you left out, which can be highly significant. Initial contact with a caregiver must always include measuring BP in both arms several times in the initial encounter. We were also taught this at the beginning and virtually never did it in reality. Measuring / comparing BP: in both arms is the easiest way to detect a patient with an obstruction in one of the arteries supplying each arm. I have an elderly cousin who went 40 years with a undiagnosed significant obstruction in her left subclavian artery that made her left arm BP about 30 mm Hg lower than the right arm BP. She did actually have high blood pressure, but recommendations for treatment varied (seemingly at random, but not actually so) depending on which arm was measured. Decades ago she had had a left carotid endarterectomy to clear out an atherosclerotic obstruction there. She saw what the surgeon had removed, and said it resembled a tube of pure white fat. It wasn't until she got her own BP cuff, tested herself at home, and determined she had a constant marked and durable lower BP in the left arm every time she did both arms in one sitting. She was then referred to a vascular surgeon who agreed with the diagnosis but said she, being 80 years old by then, would not be helped by surgery to clear the obstruction. I have talked to several dozen people with diagnosed HBP, only a single one ever had their caregiver measure both their arms during an initial visit.

Gregory Engel's avatar

A few thoughts...

• It's been many years since I've had a GP doctor who insisted on wearing a white lab coat. The few exceptions have been surgeons, particularly if they were affiliated with a teaching hospital. That doesn't obviate the many other cues present with a visit to see a doctor. Just wanted to note that, in general, the practice of medicine has become more aware of the impact of these cues and attempts to remove them.

• I learned about autonomic hyperreflexia when working at a spinal injury rehab hospital. My takeaway was the degree to which multiple small physical discomforts can collectively contribute to higher blood pressure.

• I've been taking blood pressure reading twice a day (AM & PM) for over 7 years using two different devices, taking the average of three reading per device. (This is also the only two times I check email, so it's time efficient.) Many devices on the market will do this automatically. What I've learned is that the first reading is almost always a throw-away unless I've sat and rested for about 5 minutes before taking a reading. Often, at the doc's office, they take a BP right away, just after I've been driving in traffic, walking up stairs, etc. It's always 10 clicks or more higher than the running average from readings taken at home. I've also had some surprises about what affects my BP in either direction, beyond the obvious ones like stress and physical exertion. Added benefit is that I've become sensitized to the other physiologic signs that tell me if my BP is running high or low. There's a lot more to this, which I write about here: https://remnantsway.substack.com/p/health-and-well-being-part-2-the

• The BP recommendations are a one-size fits all so unless your body composition (and age) matches what science has decided is "normal," it's important to adjust accordingly. For example, I'm 6'5" and a BP of 110/70 has me light headed and at risk for falling. My sweet spot seems to be around 125/85. My cardiologist, who's hip to these variables, agrees.

• I am on medication for BP, which has helped. It runs in the family. The twice daily BP measurements have been a critical factor in working out which medication and dosing.

A suggestion for future article: Body Mass Index (BMI.) A useful metric for populations, but a completely useless metric for individuals. Nonetheless, docs still rely on the BMI to make decisions regarding individual patients. Worse, so do the insurance companies. The Body Roundness Index (BRI) has been around for 13 years and is a better, but still not great, index to follow. The doc offices fail on this measure, too. So much so, I refuse to step on their scales as I'm fully dressed when I do. They subtract a few pounds for clothes. Hell, that's what my shoes alone weigh.

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?